If I were to ask you to
name all the types of abuse you can think of, odds are your list would be
fairly long. Verbal, physical, sexual,
mental, child, elder, financial, etc.
Essentially, any aspect of life in which you work in conjunction with
another person, has potential for abuse.
The topic of abuse is so broad, were I to try and address every form of
it, this blog would turn into a treatise and I daresay, anyone who has looked
forward to reading my writings would no longer seek them. For now, I would like you to consider the
topic of spiritual abuse. Was this type
of abuse on your list?
In The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse, David Johnson and
Jeff Van Vonderen define spiritual abuse as, “The
mistreatment of a person who is in need of help, support, or greater spiritual
empowerment, with the result of weakening, undermining, or decreasing that
person’s spiritual empowerment” (p.20). This
“spiritual empowerment” has less to do with advancement in an organizational
structure and more to do with greater personal understanding and deepening of
Ways this type of abuse can be
administered is through control due to a spiritual position or through communities
coercing a spiritual standard based in behavior or a way of thinking as a way
to stay in the good graces of the broader group. This is to say what is used as a standard to
spiritually abuse one in a Baptist denomination may look drastically different
from what is used in a Pentecostal tradition.
Though the specifics may change, the tactics cross denomination and whether
done intentionally or not, abuse is always about power and control.
Diane Langberg in Counseling
Survivors of Sexual Abuse says personhood is comprised of three components:
voice, relationship, and power. It is the essence of personhood and the effects
of abuse which struck my attention. God
created us in his image and to be made in the Imago Dei means; we have a voice,
as God used his to create the world, we are in relationship, as God is a triune
God in relationship with all his persons and is also in relationship with us,
and we are powerful as God is certainly powerful, though we are in a much more
limited though significant capacity.
Used rightly our voice is a
tool which allows us to know others and be known, our relationship is in peace
with one another, and our power is used to influence others toward good things
within our relationships (Langberg, D, pp. 45-51) When used incorrectly as in a way to assert
ourselves above another, we diminish the voice of another, break the
relationship, and leave the other powerless in the wake of whatever situation has
The effects of abuse are
certainly present in the spiritual communities we find ourselves in when those
in power use their position to squelch an opposing view or question the spiritual
health of someone with which they disagree. Or when a friend refuses to acknowledge a
wrongdoing against you and insists God will use it for his glory and all is
ultimately well, thereby breaking the trusted relationship. Or when a woman comes to church leadership to
ask for help in honoring her marriage commitment, but is fearful for her safety
due to escalating physical abuse, and is told to go home and submit to the
authority under which she finds herself.
In the case of the last example
taken directly from from Johnson and Van Vonderen, a woman went to her church
leadership afraid for her life and was told, “Stay with him, and if he kills
you, God will use that to draw him to Himself.”
Church, such a dismissive
attitude and diminishing of the value of this woman’s life does not reflect the
heart of God. If anything it reflects
the laziness at which the church addresses the complicated matters of
Think of your spiritual communities, are you free to ask questions in church? If you disagree with leadership, are you accused of sowing seeds of discord? Are women in domestic abuse situations told to be submissive to the point of death? Are the abusers tolerated or excused as a way to “honor” marriage? Is the desire to be Christlike used as a coercive manipulation? Does your church involve law enforcement when laws are broken? Do children who are abused by members within the church see the church do justly while loving mercy and ministering to the victim and abuser alike?
The church has a habit of spiritualizing
its laziness in order to protect their comfort.
Peace is more than the absence of conflict; it is the presence of rest
and safety. Do we want to follow Christ
into the darkness to rescue those held within it, or do we stand at the edge of
the light and call blindly into darkness as though we know how to guide from a
Going back to the definition we were given of spiritual abuse, “The mistreatment of a person who is in need of help, support, or greater spiritual empowerment, with the result of weakening, undermining, or decreasing that person’s spiritual empowerment” (p.20), because we take our faith with us and experience life in many different arenas, I cannot help but think that among all the other types of abuse, there is an aspect of spiritual abuse that is present. Truly, in all abuse is a need for help, support, and spiritual empowerment.
When hurting people come to God’s followers for help, do we hand them a stone in the place of bread (Matthew 7:9), or avoidantly send them into chaos with empty platitudes superficially speaking peace over them (Jer. 6:14)? When we remove ourselves from suffering, we dishonor the name of Christ and we are following our comfort rather than following him.
We need to be the followers of the One who became Emmanuel and be with them. They need to know they are seen as Hagar was seen in the desert. When they use their voice we must listen, when they need help, we must relate to them, and when they are broken we must help them regain their power by pointing them to the source. Anything less is spiritually devoid of wholeness and adds a deep injury to an already broken spirit.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain undeniable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is included in The Declaration of Independence (US 1776.)”
The truth is the world got it wrong. Something that God quickly began to teach me as I attempted to watch the well-known movie The Pursuit of Happiness. As we embark on what is easily the most hostile election year to date, it is evident we need to pursue what Jesus instructed from the first day of his ministry. We need to pursue the Kingdom of God.
As Christians, too often we associate ourselves and our circumstances with the pursuit of things that make us happy or feel good. This takes us away from the purpose of God in our lives. Happiness by definition comes from the root word, hap – which means luck, chance, or fortune. This sets the way to create an idol in our lives, one that causes us to focus on the pleasures of life and the circumstances that surround them. Take note this is something God clearly speaks about in Isaiah 65:8-12. This is even true when it comes to the election and voting for a person who makes you feel good, or even secure and happy, not necessarily what lines up with the will of God.
Does that mean that God’s will is for us to never be happy? By no means. Quite the opposite in fact. God wants us to be happy. Jesus preaches it very much so in Matt 5:3-12 commonly known as the beatitudes. Take note, however, this sermon is preached as characteristics for those who have entered into the Kingdom of God (Matthew 4:17). ‘Blessed’ in Greek means happy and in Aramaic means prosperous. What does that mean for us? It means that in order to be really happy (blessed), we need to pursue God and His Kingdom. Deeper than that, seeking God, staying in His will, produces joy, and that is something that is not dependent on circumstances, it is indwelling and solely dependent upon God.